PENULISAN HUKUM PENGARUH JENIS DAN JUMLAH BARANG BUKTI TERHADAP TUNTUTAN PIDANA DALAM KASUS PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA

SUMANTRI, SUMANTRI (2010) PENULISAN HUKUM PENGARUH JENIS DAN JUMLAH BARANG BUKTI TERHADAP TUNTUTAN PIDANA DALAM KASUS PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA. Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
Penulisan_Hukumpengaruh_Jenis_Dan_Jumlah.pdf

Download (87kB) | Preview

Abstract

Narcotics (According to Article 1 paragraph (1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotic Drugs) are substances or drugs derived from plants or no plants either synthetic or semisintetis which can cause a decrease or change in consciousness, loss of taste, reduce to relieve pain, and can cause dependence. But every Narcotics disalahgunaan often are without rights and violate the law. This act shall be accounted for secera law, the process of accountability does not escape from prosecution by the Attorney General, and the evidence seized from defendant's abuse of narcotic used as a basis for consideration to strengthen the criminal charges filed by the Attorney General to court to resolve, and provide decision for abuse of the defendant on Narcotics. This research takes the formulation of the problem: What type and amount of evidence in criminal cases the influence of drug abuse in criminal cases Narcotics This study uses a normative juridical approach, the data collection techniques using direct interviews with respondents from the Attorney General of Malang. Collection techniques of legal materials in the form of literary writings based on data taken as an object of study and will be analyzed with descriptive analysis. From interviews with the Attorney General of Malang, the data indicate that the type and amount of evidence in violation of the Narcotics affect the criminal charges being dropped by the Public Prosecutor and also affect the criminal charges against the control plan. Criminal charges being dropped by the prosecutor Public Prosecutor is also based on subjective considerations in accordance with inner attitudes, feelings and assessments of the Public Prosecutor against the accused in front of the court, either in a state of psychological or sociological circumstances of the defendant. So between prosecutors with one another attorney is not always the same

Item Type: Thesis (Other)
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law
Depositing User: Rayi Tegar Pamungkas
Date Deposited: 28 Mar 2012 02:14
Last Modified: 28 Mar 2012 02:14
URI: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/1286

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item