ANALISA YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK TERKAIT DENGAN IMPLEMENTASI HAK KEBEBASAN BERPENDAPAT DI INDONESIA DITINJAU DARI HUKUM PIDANA DAN HUKUM HAK ASASI MANUSIA

YULIANTI PARAHITA, SARI (2009) ANALISA YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK TERKAIT DENGAN IMPLEMENTASI HAK KEBEBASAN BERPENDAPAT DI INDONESIA DITINJAU DARI HUKUM PIDANA DAN HUKUM HAK ASASI MANUSIA. Other thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

[img]
Preview
Text
ANALISA_YURIDIS_TINDAK_PIDANA_PENCEMARAN_NAMA_BAIK_TERKAIT_DENGAN_IMPLEMENTASI_HAK_KEBEBASAN_BERPENDAPAT_DI_INDONESIA_DITINJAU_DARI_HUKUM_PIDANA_DAN_HUKUM_HAK_ASASI_MANUSIA.pdf

Download (142kB) | Preview

Abstract

Along with development era, repute infraction is easily used as a shield to trap the enemy into law problem. This is related to the right to have opinion, where this right is to give guarantee to anybody to speak his/her opinion, with the law as the limitation. Yet, there are still some unclear about the limitation that exist on the law of Indonesia. This research take the problem: 1. how is the limitation of freedom management of having opinion and criminal action of repute infraction that exist in Indonesia? 2. how is the limitation of freedom of opinion viewed from the law of International Human Right? This research is using juridical normative approach method, law material technique are documentation and literary from journal, books, act or law theory related to this problem. Then all the material analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. Repute infraction can be said that it is threatening of freedom to have opinion. But not only that, law such as UUD 1945, UU No. 39/1999, and UU No.9/1998 also related to limitation that exist beside the law itself, that is religion, norm, discipline, and unity of nation. The limitation is still unclear. This could create multi meaning as the effect of the limitation of freedom to have opinion. As the conclusion, repute infraction criminal article in KUHP was the form of limitation of the freedom of opinion, that are located in repute infraction and person’s owner. This should be strengthen, how big is the level that can be said as repute infraction, then other person could not used that to trap other person. Keywords: Juridical, repute infraction, opinion freedom right.

Item Type: Thesis (Other)
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law
Depositing User: Anggit Aldila
Date Deposited: 10 Jul 2012 06:30
Last Modified: 10 Jul 2012 06:30
URI: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/11732

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item