TINDAKAN PEMBONCENGAN MEREK TERHADAP SENGKETA MEREK DAGANG MS GLOW DAN PS GLOW (Studi Kasus PN Niaga Surabaya Nomer 2/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/PN Niaga Sby)

wijaya, rizky hadi (2023) TINDAKAN PEMBONCENGAN MEREK TERHADAP SENGKETA MEREK DAGANG MS GLOW DAN PS GLOW (Studi Kasus PN Niaga Surabaya Nomer 2/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/PN Niaga Sby). Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

[thumbnail of PENDAHULUAN.pdf]
Preview
Text
PENDAHULUAN.pdf

Download (2MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB I up rizky hukum.pdf]
Preview
Text
BAB I up rizky hukum.pdf

Download (400kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB II up rizky hukum.pdf]
Preview
Text
BAB II up rizky hukum.pdf

Download (462kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB III up rizky hukum.pdf]
Preview
Text
BAB III up rizky hukum.pdf

Download (532kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of BAB IV.pdf] Text
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (333kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of LAMPIRAN (1).pdf] Text
LAMPIRAN (1).pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (770kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The Trademark Law does not directly explain the passing off, but it can be
interpreted with the provisions contained in Article 21 of the Trademark Law. In
the field, there are still brands with almost the same names as well as the way they
are pronounced, so what registered trademark holders can do is to protect their
rights from acts of passing off which can lead to public misleading, such as the case
between Ms. Glow and PS. Glow. Based on the above, this paper raises the
formulation of the problem, How is the judge's consideration regarding the passing
off action between the MS GLOW and PS GLOW trademarks at the Surabaya
Commercial Court in decision No.2/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/PN Niaga Sby? And what
about the Executor of the Supreme Court Decision Number 161 K/Pdt.Sus-
HKI/2023. Then the author of this paper uses normative juridical methods with
statutory approaches and conceptual approaches. The legal materials used are
primary and secondary legal materials. From the results of the research carried
out, it can be concluded that the judge's considerations regarding the passing off
of the MS GLOW and PS GLOW trade at the Surabaya Commercial Court in
decision No.2/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/PN Niaga Sby decided in favor of the plaintiff
on behalf of PS Glow. And the implementation of the judge's sentence was to give
MS Glow a fine of 38 billion for passing off PS Glow

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Student ID: 201910110311117
Keywords: Trademark Disputes, Ms Glow, court ruling
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Department of Law (74201)
Depositing User: 201910110311117 rizkyhw31
Date Deposited: 20 Nov 2023 05:23
Last Modified: 20 Nov 2023 05:23
URI: https://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/1102

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item